FeaturedLifestyleNational

Third consecutive onslaught of Live-in relation deserves a re-look by law makers

Mobilenews24x7 Bureau

The most recent three ghastly outcomes of the Live-in relation in India, Aftab Poonawala, Sahil, and the most recent murder of the female in Rohini area by one Mohit, in Delhi has shown that, the concept was mulled to make people convenient about their personal preferences for a social union.

But something is not getting a gel with the partners and the Live in relationship does not appear not very familiar to the Asian mind-sets.

“Primarily in all these cases the relationships simply enjoy the will of two individuals but no sanction of the institutional sanctity, so it get fettered by simple shakes which is usual” opined Dr A K Ray, Bhubaneswar based psychologist dealing with human relationship and discords.

Law and society have been working hand in hand for the betterment of the individual. Law has been playing the vital role in the changing the society through its rules and regulations. In Asian countries the concept of wedding has been given the at most importance and has been about the religious ritual. Marriage has been protected by keeping the foundation of marriage strong. As in some areas change is prevailing so the law also has to change keeping in view the societal and constitutional values.

Marriage is a social union or a legal contract between people that creates kinship. The concept of live-in relationship it isn’t, may be, new to the society but the problem with the people is they are hesitating to reveal or to speak frankly about their status or live-in relationship to the society. But talking about the western culture this concept is not new for them.

The above three instances enough to warn the legal fraternity that, there is the need of a rethinking and the judiciary alone can mend the things.

Having two kids to be looked after, Mohit has burnt the 28 year old woman with a motive to kill and not to teach any lesson. Obviously that was pre-determined plan which candidly manifest that, such relationships rest more on temporary attractions but not on a lasting premise of one of the two partners.

 

 

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button